Miscarry the pregnant woman indicts province medicine to supervise

Miscarry the pregnant woman indicts province medicine to supervise
The focus one: Does Bureau of Drugs Supervision fulfil the duty?
The focus two: This medicines are " Bad medicine " (used at the end of a question)?
It is reported (reporter practises the feeling feeling) Pregnant with the child and resemble ladies but miscarry with great difficulty at 47 years old, she " imputes to " Diminish inflammation, relieve cough slice on the intersection of Zhongshan and some pharmaceutical factory that wipe out a few days ago, prove " the pregnant woman prohibited the clothes " at the medicines . She supervises the administration bureau complaining to Guangdong Province food medicines that have no resolution, then inform the administrative non-performance of province Bureau of Drugs Supervision, and ask for 3,800,000 yuan of huge compensation. The court held a hearing publicly in Yuexiu District this case yesterday.
Ms. Xiao propose whom pharmaceutical factory this produce diminish inflammation, relieve cough slice indicate careful pregnant woman with forbid the words. Ms. Xiao puts forward to province Bureau of Drugs Supervision by way of telegram, fax, three kinds express mails separately on February 12 this year, ask the legal duty of fulfilling administration of province Bureau of Drugs Supervision, province Bureau of Drugs Supervision has not answered so far, then litigate.
The defendant replies and claims, after receiving the appeal, urge municipal food medicines in Guangzhou to supervise the administration bureau immediately, food medicines of pearl district of sea of Guangzhou supervise administration bureau and Zhong Shan City food medicines supervising the administration bureau surveying case. At present, province Bureau of Drugs Supervision is requiring * pharmacy Co., Ltd. submit the special report in Zhong Shan City.
Province Bureau of Drugs Supervision thinks, because evidence does not prove this medicine causes the plaintiff to miscarry at present, so the plaintiff's appeal has not been placed on file yet at all, has just had no so-called handling time limit.
From the evidence which the defendant submits, the plaintiff finds, a slice of quality criterias used are that one try the standard that what the pharmaceutical factory of Zhongshan produces diminishes inflammation and relieves cough. Its medicines that are bought, date of production when record on packing produce after the term of validity of quality criteria of this medicines finish, should depend on that all bad medicine, province Bureau of Drugs Supervision should investigate and prosecute. As to this, the defendant debates and claims, it was 2 that should try the quality criteria and indicated and tried one, but not said that can't reuse 2 years later.
|